What is Proof-of-Stake, and How Does It Work?

The emergence of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology has drastically transformed the landscape of digital assets. As these technologies continue to gain traction, various consensus algorithms have been developed to ensure the security and integrity of transactions within decentralized networks. Among these, Proof-of-Stake (PoS) has attracted considerable interest due to its energy-efficient design and ability to address some of the limitations associated with its predecessor, Proof-of-Work (PoW).

In this article, we will demystify the concept of Proof-of-Stake, examine its operational principles, and weigh its pros and cons within the context of the cryptocurrency domain.

What is Proof-of-Stake?

Proof-of-Stake (PoS) is a consensus algorithm employed by numerous blockchain networks to authenticate and verify transactions in a decentralized fashion. In contrast to the power-hungry Proof-of-Work (PoW) method, which depends on computational resources to crack intricate mathematical problems, PoS embraces a more eco-friendly strategy by using digital asset ownership, or "stake," as the main criterion for selecting validators.

Within PoS-based systems, participants commit a specified portion of their cryptocurrency assets as collateral to qualify as validators. These validators are then chosen to generate new blocks and confirm transactions based on their proportional stake within the network. This inventive approach not only diminishes energy use but also promotes long-term investment and dedication to the network's security and ongoing stability.

How Does Proof-of-Stake Work?

The Proof-of-Stake mechanism selects a validator from a group of nodes through a random process, considering factors like coin staking duration, randomization, and node financial security. Instead of mining, Proof-of-Stake crypto systems use terms like "forging" or "minting" for block creation. Most PoS cryptocurrencies are launched with pre-created coins, enabling nodes to begin immediately.

Users participate in the block creation process by locking a certain number of coins in the network, known as staking. The more coins staked, the higher the chances of being selected as the next validator. To ensure fair selection without favoring the wealthiest nodes, unique methods like random block selection and selection by staking duration are used.

In random block selection, validators are chosen based on the lowest hash value and highest stake. It's often possible to predict the next validator since each participant's stake is public. With selection by staking duration, validators are picked based on how long their tokens have been staked. After creating a block, the duration resets, preventing "rich" nodes from dominating the blockchain.

Each crypto PoS has its own rules and methods for ensuring network efficiency. The chosen node creates a new block, verifies transactions, signs the block, and adds it to the blockchain. Validators receive a portion of transaction fees and sometimes additional coins as a reward. If a participant wants to stop being an initiator, their rewards and staked coins are locked for some time, allowing the system to check for potential fraudulent blocks.

Advantages of Proof-of-Stake

Since Proof-of-Stake (PoS) offers numerous advantages over Proof-of-Work, it is utilized in almost all new blockchains. Some of its benefits include:

Flexibility

PoS adapts to users' changing needs and the evolving blockchain landscape, as seen in the various new algorithm variations. The mechanism is versatile and suitable for most blockchain applications.

Decentralization

Operating nodes have become more accessible, and the network encourages users to run them. The incentive system and the randomization process contribute to greater decentralization. Despite the existence of staking pools, individuals have a higher chance of successfully creating a block in a PoS system, reducing the need for staking pools.

Energy Efficiency

Compared to Proof-of-Work, the PoS crypto algorithm is significantly more energy-efficient. The cost of participation depends on the economic cost of staking rather than computational power for solving puzzles, reducing energy consumption.

Scalability

As Proof-of-Stake doesn't rely on physical machines for consensus, it is more scalable. There's no need to purchase extensive mining farms or consume vast amounts of energy. Employing multiple validators on the network is more cost-effective, simpler, and more accessible.

Security

The staking mechanism motivates validators to create only legitimate blocks. If the network detects a fraudulent transaction, the validator loses a portion of their staked coins and the right to create future blocks. If the staked amount is greater than the reward, dishonest validators will lose more than they gain.

To gain control of the network and carry out fraudulent transactions, a node must hold a majority share of the network, known as a 51% attack. However, this is nearly impossible, as it would require acquiring 51% of the circulating coins.

Disadvantages of Proof-of-Stake

Despite numerous benefits over Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake has some drawbacks:

Forks

In a conventional Proof-of-Stake mechanism, there are no barriers to mining on both sides of a fork. Conversely, with Proof-of-Work, mining on both sides results in higher energy expenses. Proof-of-Stake significantly lowers costs, enabling users to "bet" on both sides of the fork.

Accessibility

Users require native blockchain tokens for staking, which can be acquired through an exchange or other means. In some cases, effective staking may necessitate a substantial investment.

In contrast, the Proof-of-Work mechanism allows users to utilize affordable mining equipment or even rent it. This enables users to join a pool, quickly start verifying transactions, and earn rewards.

51% Attack

While Proof-of-Work is vulnerable to 51% attacks, blockchains implementing the Proof-of-Stake mechanism may also be susceptible. If a token's price plummets or the blockchain has low market capitalization, attackers could purchase over 50% of the tokens at a low cost and take control of the network.

Conclusion

Proof-of-Stake has surfaced as a compelling alternative to the conventional Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism, tackling various shortcomings, especially concerning energy consumption and ecological impact. By utilizing digital asset ownership for transaction validation and network security, PoS offers a more environmentally friendly and potentially safer method for achieving consensus.

Although Proof-of-Stake boasts several benefits, it is not devoid of limitations, such as the risk of power centralization and the "nothing at stake" issue. As the technology progresses, addressing these obstacles will be vital for ensuring the enduring success and broad acceptance of PoS-driven blockchain networks.

► Sabai Academy — a place where studying blockchain, crypto, fractional ownership, and real estate investments becomes a catalyst for capital growth!